Even though the British left India over 80 years ago, India remains stuck in post-colonialism, which is why the Indian Supreme Court of post-colonialism, with its Gunga Din judges dressed like those in Britain, still looks down on India’s indigenous Hindu people, where the policies of divide and rule vote banks remain by using Western caste constructs. So it’s not surprising that recently, with all the BrahminPhobic hate being promoted against those dreaded ‘opressing aryan race, blond-haired Brahmins’ was not acknowledged by the same court.
But then why blame the court alone, when India, with its billion Hindus who hardly take action against the wider Hinduphobic state under the control of the Hindu ‘Fart Right Neo Nazi BJP ‘ led by Adolf Modi, the chai wallah?
So why aren’t we seeing millions of Brahmins along with other Hindus not coming on the streets to protest? Are Hindu temples run by ‘Brahmins’ calling for a mass protest across the country? Nope.
If they did, then suddenly these courts would do a U-turn.
Remember, the hate against the Brahmin really is a really a cover for the historical hate against Hinduism, where the Hinduphobes often claim Hinduism is a Brahmin construct to keep the masses oppressed and under Brahminical control.
We have even heard from Yoga teachers abroad that whenever they add Hinduism spiritual practices to Yoga, they suddenly get messaged not to do that, as Hinduism is a brahmin caste oppression ideology to planning to take over the West.
And thanks to the BJP, who are backed by the clown outfit, the RSS, have openly been bashing Brahmins for the ‘caste’ system. Which the Hinduphobes in the West will then say, “see, we are not Hinduphobic racists or religious fascists hating Hinduism because even Hindutva fascist India recognises Brahmin oppression”. So expect the push for caste laws attacking Brahmins to increase in the West, especially the USA.
But overall, this Brahminphobia is not about Brahmins, but the real target is Hinduism. Made worse when the majority of pseudo-Hindus claim we need ‘Hindu unity’ because caste has divided us, which is a myth explained in this article –
‘We Need Hindu Unity’ Or Do We ?
When most belong ‘unitedly’ to the Coward caste, which is the reason why Hindus continue to be targeted.
Supreme Court Dismisses Plea To Curb “Brahmophobia” & Hate Speech Against Brahmin Community
The Supreme Court on Friday refused to entertain a writ petition seeking recognition of hate speech targeting the Brahmin community, described as “Brahmophobia,” as a punishable form of caste-based discrimination. A bench of Justice BV Nagarathna and Justice Ujjal Bhuyan initially dismissed the plea after briefly hearing petitioner Mahalingam Balaji, who appeared in person. The petitioner later mentioned the matter, seeking permission to withdraw the petition with liberty to approach the appropriate forum.
Ultimately, the Court allowed him to withdraw the plea with the final order, “The petitioner who has appeared in person has sought permission to withdraw this petition. His submission is placed on record. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.” During the hearing, Justice Nagarathna said that there shouldn’t be hate speech against any community and emphasised that concerns about such issues could be addressed by following fraternity.
We don’t want hate speech against any community. It depends on education, intellectual development, tolerance, and patience. Once everyone follows fraternity, automatically there will be no hate speech.” In his petition, Balaji sought directions to Union and State governments to officially recognise hate speech targeting the Brahmin community, which he described as “Brahmophobia” as a punishable form of caste-based discrimination and to take prompt legal action against such instances in mainstream and social media. Also Read – Criminals Started Coming Into Legal Profession, BCI Tells Supreme Court He also sought a comprehensive investigation by central and state agencies into alleged coordinated domestic or foreign campaigns aimed at inciting caste conflict or promoting targeted hatred or genocide against the Brahmin community.
He further sought directions to the Union Government to constitute a high-level truth and justice commission to “investigate and acknowledge the 1948 Mahrashtra Brahmin Genocide and the 1990 Kashmiri Pandit Genocide; and to recommend measures for rehabilitative, enonomic, and educational support to surviors and their descendants.” Also Read – Blackmailing By Digital Platforms Like Digital Arrest : CJI Surya Kant The petition also sought directions for the inclusion of “appropriate chapters on Maharashtra Brahmin Genocide, 1984 Sikh Genocide and 1990 Kashmir Pandit Genocide”, in NCERT and State board textbooks, establishment of publicly funded memorial museums, and declaration of January 19 as “Genocide Victims Solidarity Day.”
The petitioner also sought directions to disqualify any public servant or constitutional office holder found indulging in caste-based hate speech against Brahmins and require NGOs to adopt a code of conduct prohibiting such hate speech.
He sought directions to NCERT to remove “misleading assertions portraying Brahmins negatively”, and require the Union Government to produce a white paper on hate and discrimination issues faced by Brahmins and action taken to address them. He also sought a pledge to never again allow Genocide and ethnic cleansing to happen in the country and promote communal harmony. During the hearing, Balaji submitted that the issue concerned targeted hate speech and selective application of hate speech laws.
He claimed that there were coordinated campaigns against Brahmins, including foreign involvement. He further contended that there is genocide denial with respect to the Kashmiri Pandit exodus of 1990. Justice Nagarathna questioned why a particular community should seek protection against hate speech against themselves only. She emphasised that no one should indulge in hate speech. The Court remarked that the concerns of the petitioner could be taken up before appropriate forums, but not the judiciary.
The Court observed that efforts must be made to promote fraternity and social awareness. On petitioner’s remark that the judiciary is also targeted, the court remarked that it is not concerned about false attacks on judiciary. Previously also, Justice Nagarathna has emphasised the importance of cultivating fraternity in order to curb hate speech. Case no. – Diary No. 69172 / 2025 –@LiveLawIndia
ChaatGPT is Upper-Caste Brahminical Propaganda Claims A Colonial Database Brain
Peter Navarro Goes Into A ‘Brahminphobia’ Attack
Video : The Good, the Bad and the Brahmin ?
The New Cool: Mock a Brahmin, Bash a Hindu, Roast a Vegan, and Cancel Mother Earth
USA : ” Malignant Corporate Brahmins ” Hinduphobic Racist Slurs By Civil Rights Department
Video : A Brahmin Lady Responds To Brahminphobia
Neo-Brahmin Supremacy Exposed
Video : Most ‘BrahminPhobia Is Also Spread By Hindus
