Friday 24th October 2014,
Hindu Human Rights Online News Magazine

Why did Krishna choose Arjuna instead of Karna,Drona or Bhishma ?

Rajesh Patel August 10, 2012 Archives, Understanding hinduism 12 Comments
Why did Krishna choose Arjuna instead of Karna,Drona or Bhishma ?



The Mahabharata is one of the greatest literature’s in the world. No other work brings out the complexity of human problems in such a profound and entertaining way. It shows us the application of philosophy when it comes to deciding between the right and wrong in such cases where the answer is not straightforward.

Four of the most striking characters in the Mahabharata are Arjuna,Karna,Drona and Bhishma  . These men were perhaps the four greatest warriors of the era and were also well learned and had firm principles by which they lived.

They lived their life by different values and their lives came to very different ends. The Mahabharata shows that all four men were great in their own way, but three of them failed in doing what is truly right and therefore came to futile ends, their lives not serving the greater good.

Out of the four characters, Arjuna is the character who stands out as the hero who future generations of Hindus admire the most. The other three are remembered as tragic heroes. Their names are not associated with the same awe and respect as that of Arjuna. They all met sad deaths on the battlefield, fighting on the side of evil despite knowing in their hearts that they were doing wrong

There is a fundamental difference in the outlook and character of these four great men that was responsible for their different outcomes.

Karna

Karna was a great warrior, in many ways greater than Arjuna. They may have been equal as archers, but physically, Karna was by far the stronger of the two. And even in sticking to one’s principles, Karna appeared more steadfast compared with Arjuna. But in Karna’s life there was one fatal flaw. He made his friendship and loyalty to Duryodhan higher than anything else, even higher than right and wrong, and even higher than God. While loyalty is a great value in such cases when it overrides a sense of dharma and even the direct calling of the Divine in the form of Shri Krishna, such loyalty leads one to a tragic end.

Karna used all his strength to serve his friend Duryodhan, without even one selfish thought for himself. However, his loyalty was so blind that he would even follow his friend when he was doing something totally wrong, selfish and harmful to others. This shows that loyalty to another person can lead even a great man to a tragic end. Dharma, and the call of God, must always be greater than loyalty to another. Karna knew what he was doing was wrong and paid the price for it.

Karna put loyalty to Duryodhan as his highest loyalty. His tragic story warns us to choose loyalties wisely. Only Krishna deserves such unflinching loyalty.

Bhishma

Bhishma was another person who never performed a selfish action in his whole life. He was mighty, learned and respected. But he too ended up fighting on the side of adharma, and came to a tragic end. He was actually an impediment to the establishment of a righteous kingdom. Why? Because he put his personal oath on a pedestal and made it the focus and obsession of his life.

That oath was that he would unquestioningly follow and do the bidding of whoever was the king of Hastinapur (Delhi). This vow, he would never break as long as he lived, even when it involved fighting his own beloved nephews who he knew had done nothing wrong.

Sticking to a vow is important, especially today when people make promises and break them the very next day (or even the very next second). But the Mahabharata demonstrates that if your attachment to a personal vow stops you from doing what is blatantly right, and ends up making you serve evil, such a vow should be discarded and set aside.

Bhishma put his personal vow above anything else, even when that vow became an instrument of evil. He disregarded Krishna’s advice, which was that to drop the vow for the greater good.

Drona

Drona was an employee of the king of Hastinapur, who happened to be Dhitirashtra, the father of Duryodhana. He was employed to teach all the princes of that kingdom in the art of warfare and statecraft, and was considered the very greatest teacher of the era. For his services, he was remunerated handsomely. Before he got this job, he was very poor and therefore was very grateful to the King for employing him.

When Duryodhan was doing wrong, Drona was fully aware of it. On some occasions he even tried to stop Duryodhan, at which Duryodhan would say: “Do not bite the hand that feeds you.”

When the battle finally dawned, Drona fought on Duryodhan’s behalf and was eventually slain in a scheme engineered by Krishna. Drona, despite being an outstanding warrior, and well versed in morality, put his loyalty towards his employer before the more important and fundamental question of dharma. Despite knowing better, he never quite had the guts to just leave and tell the king – “Enough is enough, what you are doing is wrong, I will not support you anymore.” He was too afraid of being called ungrateful.

Drona put his loyalty towards his employer above the bidding of Shri Krishna who tried to tell Drona not to keep supporting the side of evil just because of his loyalty to his employer.

Arjuna

Arjuna was a great man. Yet he had weaknesses that were actually absent in Karna, Bhishma and Drona. He was in some ways foolhardy, saying and doing several stupid things that could have landed his brothers and himself in serious trouble.

For example, at one point, Arjuna had made a vow that he would take the life of anybody who insulted his ‘Gandiva bow’, which he was exceedingly proud of. During the Mahabharata war, it happened to be Arjuna’s eldest brother and leader, Yuddhistir, who dealt the fatal insult.

Arjuna drew his sword and was about to kill his own brother, and was restrained only by Krishna’s presence. Instead of killing Yuddhistir, Arjuna instead insulted him in public. But then, Arjuna felt bad for insulting such a virtuous person as Yuddhistir, and said that he would commit suicide as there was no point even being alive after doing something so vile as insulting his own brother in public! Once again, it was only Krishna’s presence which restrained Arjuna. Krishna eventually talked Arjuna out of suicide, but Arjuna was sad that he had not kept his own word,and felt very bad. Krishna gave Arjuna a loophole. According to dharma, praising yourself in public is a sin that is as bad as one’s own death. So Krishna said to Arjuna that just praise yourself in public, and your vow will be fulfilled. And thus were the lives of both Arjuna and Yuddhistir saved.

Yet despite this foolhardy streak in his character, Arjuna is the one who is etched upon the heart of humanity as the ideal to which to aspire.

This story illustrates that while Arjuna was far from perfect, he had one over riding quality which sets him above and apart from the others. To Arjuna, it was Krishna’s words that were absolute.

He would follow Krishna’s words even at the expense of other principles or promises that he held dear. Therefore he had the grace and favour of Krishna’s guidance throughout his life.


Therefore, Arjuna’s fate was to be the hero of the era, and the instrument of God in being the restorer of dharma to society, rather than a tragic figure who ended up wasting their huge life potential in fighting on behalf of a fake cause. Arjuna put Krishna as his highest guide and ideal, and despite his faults, stands out as the most successful and glorious of the four.

Conclusion

The comparison between Karna, Drona, Bhishma and Arjuna shows us that while we can admire a person’s loyalty to a friend, loyalty to their employer and dedication to their principles or promises, all of these things must never be allowed to become an obstacle in doing what is truly for the benefit of the greater good. Krishna, the divine guide, will always shower his grace on people who will put Him first, and thus we remember Arjuna as the true hero above any of his contemporaries.

Comments

comments

Powered by Facebook Comments

Like this Article? Share it!

About The Author

British born Hindu writer and activist twho lives in London..He also writes for The Hindu Perspective Online magazine ( www. thehinduperspective.com)

  • Pingback: Why did Krishna choose Arjuna instead of Karna,Drona or Bhishma ? | The M Ways

  • Pingback: Why did Krishna choose Arjuna instead of Karna, Drona or Bhishma ? | Hindu Human Rights Online News Magazine | Shambhala

  • Pingback: Mahabharat’s Karna – The Hero or Anti-Hero? – Part 1 | Vida Manejo

  • Pingback: “Interesting Nostalgia” | Chiraans sabha

  • Pingback: Hinduism

  • Pingback: Anonymous

  • Pingback: ARJUN— Son of Indra/Zeus | INQUISITION

  • Mohit Shinde

    4th point is right!
    Dronacharya is not in race!
    And between Arjuna and Karna. Karna becoz not only stronger but also as human he is gr8 person (Danveer)!

  • Anand Shankar

    Though your anaysis is good, yet I disagree on some points:

    1. Nowhere in Mahabharata it is that Karna was physically stronger than Arjuna. Arjuna was not only the best archer, but also physically very strong. He fought with kirat. He was ready to fight with Jarasandh as well.

    2. There were some other warriors as well, who were more or less equal to Drona and Karna in prowess, such as, Bhima, Abhimanyu and Satyaki.

    3. Drona was a very shrewd person. He spoiled Eklawya’s career. Drona was incapable of defeating the mighty panchalas on his own. That is why he used kurus against them. Drona only pretended to be a virtuous person. He plotted the murder of Abhimanyu. He used to kill even ordinary soldiers using higher weapons.

    4. Drona had no obligation to fight for Duryodhana as he was a teacher and a brahmin. Whatever he got from kurus were the reward for his services as a teacher to kuru princes. It seems Drona fought from Duryodhana’s side to take the revenge from panchalas.

    5. Drona and Bhishma did not oppose Duryodhana, when he was humiliating Draupadi in public. This event shows their hypocracy.

  • Pingback: Krishna !! Please come down and help me !!! | Hindu Human Rights Online News Magazine

  • http://nil Govindan

    What a stupid question! You are a Satanic Evangelist. I don’t think that you have read the Mahabharata epic and connected stories in detail. It is not like reading Bible every day. One has to take pain to study the Mahabarata epic and many connected stories to get the inner meaning of every actions of Sri. Krishna.
    Nara- Narayana is a Hindu deity pair. Nara- Narayana is the twin- brother incarnation of the preserver- God Vishnu on earth working for the preservation of Dharma or righteousness. in the concept of Nara-Narayana, in the human soul Nara is the eternal companion of the Divine Narayana
    The Hindu epic Mahabharata identifies god Krishna with Narayana and Arjuna – the chief hero of the epic – with Nara. The legend of Nara-Narayana is also told in the scripture Bhagavata Purana. Hindus believe that the pair dwells at Badrinath, where their most important temple stands. They were born on the same day.
    Duryodhana who went to Sri Krishna for help. It was Duryodhana who opted for Sri Krishna’s army, whereas Arjuna settled for Sri Krishna. Here also Sri Krishna made a brilliant move before starting the war. He was able to satisfy Duryodhana and at the same time He established His own spy net work in the enemy camp. Not only Duryodhana, but also all the great warriors on the Kaurava side were fools, and none of them had a clear strategy to win the war, knowing very well that they were fighting against Dharma.
    On analyzing the Mahabharata war, we find that the Kaurava side had done another great blunder. Dhronacharya created the Chakravyuh or Padmavyuh, to trap and kill Arjuna. Instead of killing the unarmed Abhimanyu by breaking the war rules, the Kauravas should have captured him alive and kept him in captivity by creating another Chakravyuh. In that case Arjuna himself would have asked Sri Krishna to take him there to save his son from captivity and in the subsequent fight they could have killed Arjuna or Sri Krishna would have had to break His promise of not taking up a weapon, and might have had to use His Chakra to kill Karna, in order to save Arjuna. Here also the great warriors of the Kaurava army had failed miserably. Since most of the warier were born in Kshatriya kulam they should have shown their greatness in the war. But in reality they miserably failed in all fronts.

    Bhagwan Sri Krishna showed the people by example more than 4000 years back that war can be fought by army commanders without taking up any weapon in the hand. All the modern-day warfare is being fought by the army commanders in the same method. The Army Commander-in-Chief sits in a secure place and gives his orders to his subordinate through wireless. Since there was no wireless in those days, Sri Krishna took the position of a charioteer so as to reach any place even in the sky and watch the formation of both the army and give orders using the divine chariot and horse of Arjuna and guide him. He worked as an unofficial commander of the Pandava Army.
    Discription of Chariot and horse used by Sri Krishna-
    . This Divine golden Chariot was donated By Agni to Arjuna after Khandav Dah. Lord Hanuman was present on its Flag . This Chariot cannot be destroyed unlike chariot used by other warriors in the War and can move with great speed , it can accomodate weapons loaded in nine bullock carts. The white horses used to draw the chariot cannot be killed
    The Horses – Gandharva Chitrarath had given 100 divine horses to Arjuna , Their number didn’t decrease even if they are killed, and they can roam anywhere from Earth to Swargloka.

    • Raju

      Govindan – I don’t think you have really read and understood the article at all. Your lengthy comment doesn’t really carry any punchline nor any meaning.